In India, daughters have legal rights to their father's property, and this right is protected under the Hindu Succession Act of 1956. The Act was amended in 2005 to remove gender discrimination, which means that daughters now have equal rights in their father's property, just like sons.
Under the Act, a daughter has the same rights and liabilities as a son in relation to the property of her father. This means that a daughter has the right to inherit her father's property, including ancestral property, as a coparcener (a member of a joint Hindu family with equal rights).
However, it is Pertinent to note that if the father has made a will, the daughter's right to inherit his property may be limited or excluded, depending on the terms of the will.
It is also important to note that the law applies only to Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, and Jains. For Muslims, the law of inheritance is governed by their personal law, and for Christians, it is governed by the Indian Succession Act of 1925.
Overall, daughters in India have legal rights to their father's property, and the law protects these rights. If you have specific questions or concerns regarding your situation, it is recommended that you consult with a legal expert who can provide more personalized guidance.
CASE LAWS
here are some notable case laws related to the rights of daughters in their father's property in India:
Prakash v. Phulavati (2016)
In this case, the Supreme Court held that daughters have equal rights in their father's property, even if they were born before the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 came into force. This means that daughters can claim their share in ancestral property even if their father passed away before the amendment was made.
Danamma v. Amar (2018)
In this case, the Supreme Court held that daughters have equal rights in their father's property, even if the father died before the amendment was made in 2005, but the property had not been partitioned by that time. This means that daughters can claim their share in ancestral property, even if their father passed away before 2005, as long as the property was not partitioned before 2005.
Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020)
In this case, the Supreme Court held that daughters have equal rights in their father's property, even if their father passed away before the amendment was made in 2005 and the property was partitioned before that time. The court also held that daughters have the right to claim partition of ancestral property, even if the father had died before 2005 and the partition had not been made at that time.
These cases reaffirm the equal rights of daughters in their father's property and show that the law is on the side of daughters who want to claim their rightful share in ancestral property. However, it is important to note that each case is unique and the outcome may depend on the specific circumstances and evidence presented.
THANK YOU FOR READING