Audi Alteram Partem case laws in India

Introduction of the Audi Alteram Partem case laws in India: – One of the fundamental needs under the foundations of natural justice is the legal maximAudi Alteram Partem“. The interpretation of the maxims, as well as their application and relevant case law, have been discussed in this article.

Meaning and Origin

Audi Alteram Partem is a Latin-derived legal maxim. Audi means ‘hear/listen,’ alteram means ‘other,’ and partem means ‘side/party,’ therefore the maxim Audi Alteram Partem literally translates ‘Hear the other side or Allow the other party to be actually heard.’


One of the foundational notions of fairness and justice is Audi Alteram Partem. In layman’s words, it says that the court cannot make a decision before both sides have been heard, i.e., both the plaintiff and defendant should have the right or opportunity to submit their case to the court.

It offers the parties to a lawsuit the right to have their voices heard, and any major judgment made without hearing to both sides is regarded to be against natural justice norms.

Implementation major steps include aforementioned

Right to Notice

It essentially refers to the right to be fully aware. The notice should include all relevant information, such as the date at least, time, and location where the person is required to be actually present. An order issued without prior notice violates the precepts of Natural Justice.


Hearing can occur both orally and in person. It is a right granted to both parties to represent their case in court.


No evidence should be introduced in an ex parte proceeding before a legal proceeding. Both parties must be present.

Both parties should be given an equal opportunity to represent themselves in the courtroom through a legal representative of their choice. This right is also guaranteed U/A 22(2) of the Constitution of India.

Exception to the principle

  • Exclusion by Statute
  • Impossibility of Parliamentary Function
  • Cases of Importance

Significant case laws

In P.N.B v. All India Bank Employee Federation

A penalty was levied on some accusations that were not specified in the notice provided to the defendant who was subjected to the penalties. The court determined that the notification was erroneous, and therefore the penalty was unconstitutional.

In Harbans Lal v. Commissioner

The Supreme Court of India decided That the party upon whom penalties were levied should be given a proper chance to defend the same and that this is a very important aspect of the concept.

AMICUS CURIAE with case Laws

Amicus Curiae is a legal term that refers to a person who supports the court by providing help and advice on legal or factual issues. With the use of relevant case law.

Origin and Significance

The legal adage Amicus Curiae is a Latin phrase that means “court friend”. As Amicus denotes “friend” and Curiae denotes “court,” amicus curiae simply signifies “friend of the court.”


Amicus curiae, often known as a friend of the courts, is an individual who helps, advises, and informs the court of law on legal issues involved.

This maxim’s primary characteristics are as follows:

  • He or she is a third party to the lawsuit who isn’t even a party to the lawsuit.
  • He or she has no vested significant stake in the legal precedent’s conclusion.
  • His or her viewpoint is impartial and in the best interests of society as a whole.


In some circumstances, the court finds it very difficult to reach a decision and seeks legal briefs from experts in the field in the subject matter of the lawsuit, or some people may volunteer to assist.

Amicus Curiae is a person who supports the court by providing guidance relevant to the case’s issues. Whether or not to review the Amicus briefs is entirely up to the court.

Significant Case Laws

Salmon LJ stated in Allen v. Sir Alfred Mc. Alpine & Sons

Ltd that the responsibility of Amicus Curiae is to aid the judiciary by unbiasedly elucidating the law or, if any of the parties are unrepresented, supposed to be representing and trying to advance the valid argument on behalf of that party. This is taken to ensure the decision’s reliability and that both parties are represented properly.

In the case of Anokhilal v. the State of M.P

the court established the following recommendations:

  • In cases involving life-or-death sentences, Counsel with a minimum of 10 years of practice at the Bar may be designated as Amicus Curiae or to actually represent the alleged perpetrator.
  • When a counsel is assigned as an Amicus Curiae, he or she should be offered sufficient information to comprehend the best-case circumstance and properly prepare the issue.
  • Discussions with the alleged perpetrator are permitted if the Amicus Curiae is going to represent the alleged perpetrator.


Define Torts and its essential elements

Damnum Sine Injuria and Injuria Sine Damnum

Share this Article:

Leave a Comment

Difference between CrPC and IPC Hierarchy of Indian courts Malimath Committee Report Prime Minister Narendra Modi Section 154 of CrPC Career options after completing LLB India’s relationship with other countries Expansion Commercial Surrogacy and barriers Bailment and parole difference Prince Harry and Meghan evicted from their royal residence in the UK Silicon Valley Bank & Signature Bank both went bankrupt unexpectedly. WOMAN OR MAN, ADDRESS JUDGE AS ‘SIR’ It will completely ruin the Indian family concept: Indian Govt opposes same-sex marriage validation in S.C A man from Delhi has been arrested for harassing & stalking 50 women on social sites. If you do these things on WhatsApp, you could end up in jail. Indian government’s new rules for cryptocurrency trading and NFTs come under “Money Laundering Provisions.” chatGPT fails the UPSC exam, answering only 54/100 questions. Half of the US companies that use AI bots, ChatGPT replaces humans. Delhi minister Manish Sisodia was arrested and taken to Tihar Jail. five new Judges Of The Supreme Court who will take the oath  on February 6th.