Prima facie legal maxim : defined and origin

Prima facie legal maxim

Introduction of the Prima facie legal maxim: – The term comes from Latin and it signifies “the case at first sight“. As the phrase implies, it is a preliminary assessment of a case to see whether there is enough proof to proceed with a trial. A party with the burden of proof makes a prima facie case when it produces enough evidence to justify a verdict in favour of the party, provided the opposition party does not rebut or oppose it.

By doing so, the party bearing the burden of proof has demonstrated that it is possible for him or her to meet it with regard to each component of the case. A motion for a verdict in favour of the opposing party may be made when the party bearing the burden of proof cannot establish a prima facie case and hence cannot prevail.

A successful presentation of a prima facie case does not imply that a party will win. The opposing party may subsequently present evidence that opposes (rebuts) the other party’s prima facie case. The burden of the proof party then has the opportunity to challenge the rebuttal evidence.

Prima facie legal maxim: Defined and Origin

Prima Facie is a Latin phrase used in law. The proverb literally means “on the face of it“.


Unless it is refuted or disproved, prima facie can be used as an adjective to describe something that appears to be true. It is the establishment of a rebuttal assumption that constitutes a preliminary case. The preliminary action is a cause of action or defence that, if not opposed by the opposing party, provides enough evidence to support a ruling in favour of one party.


A plaintiff initiates a lawsuit in civil litigation claiming that the defendant’s actions (or inactions) caused the injury and damage. For instance, a company may allege that one of its suppliers breached a contract when an order failed to arrive, causing the company to lose clients.

The complaint submitted to the court includes a general description of the cause of the action, the sort of damage, and any potential respondent involvement in the damage. The court must decide if there are sufficient reasons for the matter to proceed before a trial. The judge may decide that there is enough proof to create a rebuttable presumption in favour of the plaintiff at the preliminary hearing’s initial review of the petition. As a result, this situation is regarded as prima facie evidence.

A prima facie case would exist if, during a murder trial, the prosecution produced video footage of the accused uttering death threats to the deceased victim. This would prove that the accused had the intention to kill the victim.

Conclusion of the Prima facie legal maxim

When the plaintiff has the burden of proof in a civil case, prima facie is frequently applied. Unfortunately, just because a case has been resolved prima facie does not mean that the plaintiff will prevail. If the plaintiff lacks to present adequate evidence to support their claim, the court will most likely dismiss the suit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q. What does “prima facie” mean in legal terms?

Ans. When the prosecution has sufficient evidence to proceed with a trial of judgement and establish the defendant’s guilt, the phrase “prima facie” is used in legal contexts. The expression is a translation of a Latin word that means “at first vision” or “at first sight.”

Q. What does a prima facie case mean in India?

Ans. A Prima facie case denotes that the plaintiff has a case that should be considered and is not immediately liable to be dismissed.

Q. What exactly is the prima facie duty theory?

Ans. A prima facie responsibility is one that is binding (obligatory) unless it is superseded or overridden by another duty or duties.  Another way to put it is that where there appears to be a prima facie responsibility to do something, there is a strong presumption in support of executing.


Law and Justice : objective and definition

What is Oral Evidence under Indian evidence act, 1872

Doctrine of Reasonable classification in Administrative Law

Share this Article:

Leave a Comment

Expansion Commercial Surrogacy and barriers Bailment and parole difference Prince Harry and Meghan evicted from their royal residence in the UK Silicon Valley Bank & Signature Bank both went bankrupt unexpectedly. WOMAN OR MAN, ADDRESS JUDGE AS ‘SIR’ It will completely ruin the Indian family concept: Indian Govt opposes same-sex marriage validation in S.C A man from Delhi has been arrested for harassing & stalking 50 women on social sites. If you do these things on WhatsApp, you could end up in jail. Indian government’s new rules for cryptocurrency trading and NFTs come under “Money Laundering Provisions.” chatGPT fails the UPSC exam, answering only 54/100 questions. Half of the US companies that use AI bots, ChatGPT replaces humans. Delhi minister Manish Sisodia was arrested and taken to Tihar Jail. five new Judges Of The Supreme Court who will take the oath  on February 6th. Bombay High Court rules on a woman’s right to have or not to have an abortion. “Last seen” Theory New parliament building India “Parakram Divas” Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose birth anniversary Republic Day 2023 and chief guest for Republic day 2023 About Republic day Nations with their own Republic day