S.c Rejects 89-Year-Old Man’s Plea for Divorce to his 82-Year-Old Wife

S.c Rejects 89-Year-Old Man’s Plea for Divorce to his 82-Year-Old Wife

Best Law Books

S.c Rejects 89-Year-Old Man’s Plea for Divorce to his 82-Year-Old Wife


The Supreme Court of India recently made headlines by rejecting an 89-year-old man’s plea to divorce his 82-year-old wife in the case of Nirmal Singh Panesar v Paramjit Kaun Panesar. The verdict, delivered by Justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi, carries significant implications regarding the interpretation of the “irretrievable breakdown of marriage.”

The “Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage” Not a Blanket Formula


The court’s decision firmly states that the concept of an “irretrievable breakdown of marriage” should not be rigidly applied as a one-size-fits-all formula for granting divorces, especially under Article 142 of the Indian Constitution. This reiterates the court’s commitment to considering the unique circumstances of each case.

The Sanctity of Marriage in Indian Society

The judges underscored the continued reverence for marriage in India, despite the increasing prevalence of divorce cases. Marriage is still regarded as a sacred and profound emotional bond between spouses in Indian society. This acknowledgment sets the stage for the court’s ruling.

Wife’s Willingness to Maintain the Relationship

In this specific case, the court noted that the wife expressed her commitment to caring for her husband, even in their later years. She adamantly stated her desire not to carry the “divorcee” label, further emphasizing the significance of her sentiments.

Potential Injustice to the Wife

The court expressed concerns that granting a divorce based on the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage would be unjust to the wife. It highlighted the importance of respecting the wife’s feelings and sentiments, emphasizing her reluctance to bear the stigma of being a “divorcee.”

Background of the Case

The court considered the plea filed by an 89-year-old man seeking a divorce. The dispute arose from the deterioration of the couple’s relationship when the husband, a retired Indian Army serviceman, was stationed in Madras (now Chennai) in January 1984, and the wife chose not to accompany him. Instead, she opted to reside with her husband’s parents and later with her son.

Legal Journey

The husband pursued a divorce, citing his wife’s refusal to join him in Chennai as evidence of her intention to permanently terminate cohabitation without justifiable grounds. Initially, a district court granted the divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, but the Punjab and Haryana High Court later overturned this decision, prompting the husband to file an appeal with the Supreme Court.

Legal Arguments

The appellant argued that the High Court erred by overturning the divorce decree that concluded the wife had cruelly deserted him without explanation. In contrast, his wife’s counsel contended that a prolonged separation alone does not constitute an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. She emphasized the wife’s unwavering dedication to their sacred relationship.

The Court’s Verdict

Ultimately, the Supreme Court concurred with the wife’s submissions. They noted that the wife had maintained the sanctity of the marriage since 1963 and had nurtured three children, even when her husband displayed hostility towards them. Consequently, the court rejected the husband’s plea for a divorce and dismissed the appeal.

Legal Representation

Advocate Vipin Gogia represented the appellant-husband, while Advocate Madhurima Tatia represented the respondent-wife.

Read More

Supreme Court Divided on 26-Week Abortion Case of a Married Woman Refers to Larger Bench

Share this Article:

Leave a Comment

Presidents Day 2024: History, Significance, and Shopping Deals The Pubic examinations (prevention of unfair means) bill, 2024 Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision on Electoral Bonds Scheme Restrictions Imposed under Section 144 in Delhi till March 12 Dual Citizenship: Insights and Challenges for Indians Abroad Delhi High Court Bar Association Honors Legal Pioneers in Landmark Cases Digital Arrest New Scam Delhi Judicial Service Exam 2023: Notification Overview Switzerland Parliament Passes Burqa Ban: What You Need to Know Woman Loses All Limbs After Consuming Contaminated Tilapia fish Important Legal Maxim UK ban American xl bully dog Rosh Hashanah 2023 G20 Summit 2023 Full Moon Supermoon Blue Moon India Gears Up to Host G20 Summit in Delhi 2023 Shivaji Maharaj Statue desecrated in Goa Dubai burj khalifa Indian flag 2023 Partition horrors remembrance day Indiana mom dies after drinking water